Navigating the Future of Transportation: Why Pragmatism Trumps Ideology
YouTube
LinkedIn
x.com - @TruesdellWealth
Truesdell Wealth Events
Eirinn Abu Concert - Sponsored by The Truesdell Companies
Ocala Events: January 8th - Casual Breakfast Conversation / February 19th - Casual Cocktail Conversations (Beer, Wine, Mixed Drinks)
Online & On-Demand - January 1 through January 11th: Why Bundling Could Kill You -
Energy and transportation policies are often steeped in political rhetoric, driven by idealistic aspirations that frequently overlook pragmatic realities. Whether the propulsion system relies on fossil fuels, electricity, hydrogen, or even nuclear power, the essence of transportation technologies lies in using the right tools for the right jobs under the right circumstances. Managing expectations is crucial, and we must resist the urge to apply one-size-fits-all solutions to complex problems. This is not about ideology but about proportionality and practicality. The concept is akin to building the Panama Canal: small tools like shovels were as indispensable as massive dredgers. Similarly, transportation technologies must align with specific needs and contexts.
Take electric vehicles (EVs) as an example. The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), heralded as the largest climate policy in U.S. history, is projected to generate $3 trillion in direct and induced spending. While such investments might sound promising, it’s worth noting the disingenuous nature of legislative titles. Much like internet memes, names such as the “Save the World Act” or “We Love Babies Legislation” often obscure the actual outcomes. The IRA’s aggressive push toward EVs, coupled with government subsidies, illustrates a recurring challenge: policy decisions frequently prioritize political optics over engineering economics.
And as a reminder, this podcast is sponsored by the Truesdell companies, which include Truesdell Wealth, Truesdell Insurance, Truz Consulting, Truesdell Media, Truesdell Law, and Truesdell Real Estate. For more information, visit truesdell.net, and for a listing of our upcoming events, visit truesdellwealth.com/events.
The widespread adoption of EVs brings into question their effectiveness in achieving the intended environmental goals. Proponents claim that EVs will significantly reduce oil dependence and carbon emissions. However, the practical reality is far less straightforward. Manufacturing EV batteries requires intensive mining for rare-earth elements, while charging them demands electricity that, in many regions, still comes predominantly from fossil fuels. Moreover, as we observe collapsing growth rates in EV sales in both the U.S. and Europe, it’s clear that market saturation and logistical constraints are beginning to hinder the electrification narrative.
Contextual suitability is key to understanding the limitations of any propulsion system. For example, slow-moving vehicles like golf carts are ideal for retirement communities such as The Villages or Sun City. These neighborhoods often have separate roadways or shared spaces for such vehicles, making EVs a sensible choice in these controlled environments. However, even here, these vehicles rely on asphalt roads—a product derived from petroleum. The paradox is clear: the production, transportation, and maintenance of infrastructure for EVs still depend on fossil fuels. This begs the question of whether the touted environmental benefits truly outweigh the costs.
Another critical factor is the engineering and logistical demands of emergency services. Consider helicopters used for medical evacuations. Transitioning these vehicles to electric propulsion in their current technological state would drastically reduce their operational range and effectiveness. Similarly, ambulances, which require substantial power for their onboard medical equipment and high-speed transport capabilities, cannot yet be reliably powered by batteries. Imagine waiting for a battery to charge during a life-threatening emergency; the consequences would be catastrophic. The same applies to nuclear-powered ships and submarines, which provide unmatched endurance and operational range for critical missions. These technologies exist because they are optimally suited to their specific roles.
And as a reminder, we are speaking on four topics on January 8 at the Stone Creek Grill. At 9:45 AM, we begin with an unlimited breakfast buffet, and everyone who has previously attended will have the first opportunity to make a reservation for the February 19 afternoon conversation over cocktails, which includes beer, wine, and a variety of cocktails, once again at the Stone Creek Grill. For more information on all of these, you can text or call 352-612-1000 or visit one of our corporate websites and use the contact forms to get in touch.
Here is the bottom line. As an investment advisor, I have to always be aware of bias: political bias, personal bias, herd mentality, and propaganda. These sources of influence can be both domestic and international. They range from genuinely sincere to sinister and malevolent. Morals, ethics, and societal mores are rarely clear-cut. For instance, if I said there was a mutual fund that invested in the murder of innocent men, women, and children, it would spark moral outrage. And yet, when you invest with me through our military procurement portfolio, you are indirectly investing in the deaths of innocents worldwide. Think about that. However, if I framed it as investing in companies protecting and defending men, women, and children from dangerous dictators and despots, suddenly it becomes a patriotic and ethical decision. The narrative depends entirely on the words used and the picture painted.
So, speaking of electric vehicles, the optimal propulsion system for any vehicle—be it electric, hydrogen, fossil fuel, or nuclear—depends on its intended use and the engineering economics behind it. Context matters, as does proportionality. Advocating for a singular solution to the multifaceted challenges of energy and transportation is as shortsighted as trying to dig the Panama Canal with only one type of tool. Pragmatism, not ideology, should guide our decisions. It’s time to prioritize what works under the right circumstances and embrace a diversified approach that respects the complexity of our world.
x.com - @TruesdellWealth
Truesdell Wealth Events
Eirinn Abu Concert - Sponsored by The Truesdell Companies
Ocala Events: January 8th - Casual Breakfast Conversation / February 19th - Casual Cocktail Conversations (Beer, Wine, Mixed Drinks)
Online & On-Demand - January 1 through January 11th: Why Bundling Could Kill You -
Energy and transportation policies are often steeped in political rhetoric, driven by idealistic aspirations that frequently overlook pragmatic realities. Whether the propulsion system relies on fossil fuels, electricity, hydrogen, or even nuclear power, the essence of transportation technologies lies in using the right tools for the right jobs under the right circumstances. Managing expectations is crucial, and we must resist the urge to apply one-size-fits-all solutions to complex problems. This is not about ideology but about proportionality and practicality. The concept is akin to building the Panama Canal: small tools like shovels were as indispensable as massive dredgers. Similarly, transportation technologies must align with specific needs and contexts.
Take electric vehicles (EVs) as an example. The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), heralded as the largest climate policy in U.S. history, is projected to generate $3 trillion in direct and induced spending. While such investments might sound promising, it’s worth noting the disingenuous nature of legislative titles. Much like internet memes, names such as the “Save the World Act” or “We Love Babies Legislation” often obscure the actual outcomes. The IRA’s aggressive push toward EVs, coupled with government subsidies, illustrates a recurring challenge: policy decisions frequently prioritize political optics over engineering economics.
And as a reminder, this podcast is sponsored by the Truesdell companies, which include Truesdell Wealth, Truesdell Insurance, Truz Consulting, Truesdell Media, Truesdell Law, and Truesdell Real Estate. For more information, visit truesdell.net, and for a listing of our upcoming events, visit truesdellwealth.com/events.
The widespread adoption of EVs brings into question their effectiveness in achieving the intended environmental goals. Proponents claim that EVs will significantly reduce oil dependence and carbon emissions. However, the practical reality is far less straightforward. Manufacturing EV batteries requires intensive mining for rare-earth elements, while charging them demands electricity that, in many regions, still comes predominantly from fossil fuels. Moreover, as we observe collapsing growth rates in EV sales in both the U.S. and Europe, it’s clear that market saturation and logistical constraints are beginning to hinder the electrification narrative.
Contextual suitability is key to understanding the limitations of any propulsion system. For example, slow-moving vehicles like golf carts are ideal for retirement communities such as The Villages or Sun City. These neighborhoods often have separate roadways or shared spaces for such vehicles, making EVs a sensible choice in these controlled environments. However, even here, these vehicles rely on asphalt roads—a product derived from petroleum. The paradox is clear: the production, transportation, and maintenance of infrastructure for EVs still depend on fossil fuels. This begs the question of whether the touted environmental benefits truly outweigh the costs.
Another critical factor is the engineering and logistical demands of emergency services. Consider helicopters used for medical evacuations. Transitioning these vehicles to electric propulsion in their current technological state would drastically reduce their operational range and effectiveness. Similarly, ambulances, which require substantial power for their onboard medical equipment and high-speed transport capabilities, cannot yet be reliably powered by batteries. Imagine waiting for a battery to charge during a life-threatening emergency; the consequences would be catastrophic. The same applies to nuclear-powered ships and submarines, which provide unmatched endurance and operational range for critical missions. These technologies exist because they are optimally suited to their specific roles.
And as a reminder, we are speaking on four topics on January 8 at the Stone Creek Grill. At 9:45 AM, we begin with an unlimited breakfast buffet, and everyone who has previously attended will have the first opportunity to make a reservation for the February 19 afternoon conversation over cocktails, which includes beer, wine, and a variety of cocktails, once again at the Stone Creek Grill. For more information on all of these, you can text or call 352-612-1000 or visit one of our corporate websites and use the contact forms to get in touch.
Here is the bottom line. As an investment advisor, I have to always be aware of bias: political bias, personal bias, herd mentality, and propaganda. These sources of influence can be both domestic and international. They range from genuinely sincere to sinister and malevolent. Morals, ethics, and societal mores are rarely clear-cut. For instance, if I said there was a mutual fund that invested in the murder of innocent men, women, and children, it would spark moral outrage. And yet, when you invest with me through our military procurement portfolio, you are indirectly investing in the deaths of innocents worldwide. Think about that. However, if I framed it as investing in companies protecting and defending men, women, and children from dangerous dictators and despots, suddenly it becomes a patriotic and ethical decision. The narrative depends entirely on the words used and the picture painted.
So, speaking of electric vehicles, the optimal propulsion system for any vehicle—be it electric, hydrogen, fossil fuel, or nuclear—depends on its intended use and the engineering economics behind it. Context matters, as does proportionality. Advocating for a singular solution to the multifaceted challenges of energy and transportation is as shortsighted as trying to dig the Panama Canal with only one type of tool. Pragmatism, not ideology, should guide our decisions. It’s time to prioritize what works under the right circumstances and embrace a diversified approach that respects the complexity of our world.